Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)

Hashrate 1.5 GH/s Power 2,350 W Efficiency 1,566,666.7 J/TH
VS
Jasminer X44-P

Jasminer X44-P

Hashrate 23.4 GH/s Power 2,550 W Efficiency 108,974.4 J/TH

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Jasminer X44-P

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) Specification Jasminer X44-P
1.5 GH/s Hashrate 23.4 GH/s
2,350 W Power Consumption 2,550 W
1,566,666.7 J/TH Efficiency 108,974.4 J/TH
Noise Level 80 dB
Weight 15.7 kg
8,018 BTU/hr BTU Output 8,701 BTU/hr
26/100 Home Mining Score 29/100
Release Year
EtHash Algorithm EtHash
Innosilicon Manufacturer Jasminer

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$5.64
Daily Profit -$5.64
Monthly -$169.20
Yearly -$2,058.58

Jasminer X44-P

Daily Revenue 0.00000001 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$6.12
Daily Profit -$6.12
Monthly -$183.57
Yearly -$2,233.49

Based on BTC price of $78,221 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Jasminer X44-P comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 1460% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Jasminer X44-P's favour. The Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) holds the edge in power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Jasminer X44-P — wins on 5 of 6 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) and Jasminer X44-P actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Jasminer X44-P 1460% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) 8% better power draw (2,350 vs 2,550 W)
  • Jasminer X44-P 93% better efficiency (1,566,667 vs 108,974 J/TH)
  • Jasminer X44-P 9% more heat output (8,018 vs 8,701 BTU/hr)
  • Jasminer X44-P 12% more home mining score (26.0 vs 29.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) Metric Jasminer X44-P
$1,200 Upfront cost (MSRP) $5,580
-$5.64 Daily net profit -$6.12
-$3,259 Net after 1 year -$7,813
-$5,317 Net after 2 years -$10,047
-$7,376 Net after 3 years -$12,280
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Jasminer X44-P

Score: 29/100. 80 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Jasminer X44-P

108,974.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) or Jasminer X44-P more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) is more profitable at $-5.64/day compared to $-6.12/day for the Jasminer X44-P. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) or Jasminer X44-P?

The Jasminer X44-P is quieter at 80 dB compared to the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) or Jasminer X44-P?

The Jasminer X44-P scores 29/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Jasminer X44-P: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) runs at 1,566,666.7 J/TH while the Jasminer X44-P runs at 108,974.4 J/TH — a difference of 1,457,692.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 93% better efficiency (1,566,667 vs 108,974 J/TH).