Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Innosilicon A5 DashMaster

Innosilicon A5 DashMaster

Hashrate 32.5 GH/s Power 750 W Efficiency 23,076.9 J/TH
VS
Baikal Giant A900

Baikal Giant A900

Hashrate 900.0 MH/s Power 270 W Efficiency 300,000.0 J/TH

Innosilicon A5 DashMaster vs Baikal Giant A900

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon A5 DashMaster Specification Baikal Giant A900
32.5 GH/s Hashrate 900.0 MH/s
750 W Power Consumption 270 W
23,076.9 J/TH Efficiency 300,000.0 J/TH
Noise Level
3,100.0 kg Weight 2,550.0 kg
2,559 BTU/hr BTU Output 921 BTU/hr
30/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
X11 Algorithm X11
Innosilicon Manufacturer Baikal

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon A5 DashMaster

Daily Revenue 0.00000001 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.80
Daily Profit -$1.80
Monthly -$53.96
Yearly -$656.57

Baikal Giant A900

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.65
Daily Profit -$0.65
Monthly -$19.44
Yearly -$236.51

Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Innosilicon A5 DashMaster, which leads on 2 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 3511% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Baikal Giant A900 claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Innosilicon A5 DashMaster — wins on 2 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Innosilicon A5 DashMaster and Baikal Giant A900 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Innosilicon A5 DashMaster 3511% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Baikal Giant A900 64% better power draw (750 vs 270 W)
  • Innosilicon A5 DashMaster 92% better efficiency (23,077 vs 300,000 J/TH)
  • Baikal Giant A900 18% better weight (3,100 vs 2,550 kg)
  • Innosilicon A5 DashMaster 178% more heat output (2,559 vs 921 BTU/hr)
  • Baikal Giant A900 3% more home mining score (30.0 vs 31.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Innosilicon A5 DashMaster Metric Baikal Giant A900
Upfront cost (MSRP) $2,499
-$1.80 Daily net profit -$0.65
-$657 Net after 1 year -$2,735
-$1,313 Net after 2 years -$2,972
-$1,970 Net after 3 years -$3,209
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Baikal Giant A900

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Innosilicon A5 DashMaster

23,076.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Innosilicon A5 DashMaster vs Baikal Giant A900: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal Giant A900 is more profitable at $-0.65/day compared to $-1.80/day for the Innosilicon A5 DashMaster. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Innosilicon A5 DashMaster or the Baikal Giant A900 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Innosilicon A5 DashMaster or the Baikal Giant A900?

The Baikal Giant A900 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Innosilicon A5 DashMaster). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Innosilicon A5 DashMaster and Baikal Giant A900 on J/TH?

The Innosilicon A5 DashMaster runs at 23,076.9 J/TH while the Baikal Giant A900 runs at 300,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 276,923.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 92% better efficiency (23,077 vs 300,000 J/TH).