Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Innosilicon A8C CryptoMaster

Innosilicon A8C CryptoMaster

Hashrate 80.0 KH/s Power 175 W Efficiency 2,187,500,000.0 J/TH
VS
Baikal BK-N

Baikal BK-N

Hashrate 40.0 KH/s Power 60 W Efficiency 1,500,000,000.0 J/TH

Innosilicon A8C CryptoMaster vs Baikal BK-N

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon A8C CryptoMaster Specification Baikal BK-N
80.0 KH/s Hashrate 40.0 KH/s
175 W Power Consumption 60 W
2,187,500,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 1,500,000,000.0 J/TH
Noise Level
2,640.0 kg Weight 1,800.0 kg
597 BTU/hr BTU Output 205 BTU/hr
33/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
Cryptonight Algorithm Cryptonight
Innosilicon Manufacturer Baikal

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon A8C CryptoMaster

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.42
Daily Profit -$0.42
Monthly -$12.60
Yearly -$153.30

Baikal BK-N

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.14
Daily Profit -$0.14
Monthly -$4.32
Yearly -$52.56

Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Baikal BK-N comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 4 (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 66% better power draw (175.0 vs 60.0 W). Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Baikal BK-N — wins on 4 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Innosilicon A8C CryptoMaster and Baikal BK-N actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Innosilicon A8C CryptoMaster 100% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Baikal BK-N 66% better power draw (175.0 vs 60.0 W)
  • Baikal BK-N 31% better efficiency (2,187,500,000 vs 1,500,000,000 J/TH)
  • Baikal BK-N 32% better weight (2,640 vs 1,800 kg)
  • Innosilicon A8C CryptoMaster 192% more heat output (597 vs 205 BTU/hr)
  • Baikal BK-N 9% more home mining score (33.0 vs 36.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Innosilicon A8C CryptoMaster Metric Baikal BK-N
$1,000 Upfront cost (MSRP) $500
-$0.42 Daily net profit -$0.14
-$1,153 Net after 1 year -$553
-$1,307 Net after 2 years -$605
-$1,460 Net after 3 years -$658
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Baikal BK-N

Score: 36/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Baikal BK-N

1,500,000,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Innosilicon A8C CryptoMaster vs Baikal BK-N: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal BK-N is more profitable at $-0.14/day compared to $-0.42/day for the Innosilicon A8C CryptoMaster. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Innosilicon A8C CryptoMaster or the Baikal BK-N better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Innosilicon A8C CryptoMaster vs Baikal BK-N: which fits a residential setup better?

The Baikal BK-N scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 33/100 for the Innosilicon A8C CryptoMaster). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Innosilicon A8C CryptoMaster vs Baikal BK-N: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Innosilicon A8C CryptoMaster runs at 2,187,500,000.0 J/TH while the Baikal BK-N runs at 1,500,000,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 687,500,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 31% better efficiency (2,187,500,000 vs 1,500,000,000 J/TH).