Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell E-AL1M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Specification | Goldshell E-AL1M |
|---|---|---|
| 54.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 4.4 TH/s |
| 530 W | Power Consumption | 1,800 W |
| 9,814,814.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 409.1 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 3.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 1,808 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,142 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX II
Goldshell E-AL1M
Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell E-AL1M edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 8148048% more hashrate (0.0 vs 4.4 TH/s). The Goldshell AE-BOX II holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell E-AL1M sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell E-AL1M 8148048% more hashrate (0.0 vs 4.4 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 71% better power draw (530 vs 1,800 W)
- Goldshell E-AL1M 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 409 J/TH)
- Goldshell E-AL1M 240% more heat output (1,808 vs 6,142 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 132% more home mining score (65.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Metric | Goldshell E-AL1M |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $799 |
| -$1.27 | Daily net profit | -$4.16 |
| -$584 | Net after 1 year | -$2,318 |
| -$1,049 | Net after 2 years | -$3,837 |
| -$1,513 | Net after 3 years | -$5,356 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX IIScore: 65/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell E-AL1M409.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell E-AL1M: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX II is more profitable at $-1.27/day compared to $-4.16/day for the Goldshell E-AL1M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell E-AL1M: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell E-AL1M at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell E-AL1M?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Goldshell E-AL1M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell E-AL1M: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II runs at 9,814,814.8 J/TH while the Goldshell E-AL1M runs at 409.1 J/TH — a difference of 9,814,405.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 409 J/TH).