Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell KD6-SE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Specification | Goldshell KD6-SE |
|---|---|---|
| 54.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 25.3 TH/s |
| 530 W | Power Consumption | 2,300 W |
| 9,814,814.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 90.9 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 3.0 kg | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 1,808 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,848 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2s |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX II
Goldshell KD6-SE
Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell KD6-SE, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 46851752% more hashrate (0.0 vs 25.3 TH/s) in the Goldshell KD6-SE's favour. That said, the Goldshell AE-BOX II isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell KD6-SE actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell KD6-SE 46851752% more hashrate (0.0 vs 25.3 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 77% better power draw (530 vs 2,300 W)
- Goldshell KD6-SE 100% better efficiency (9,814,814.8 vs 90.9 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 100% better weight (3.0 vs 8,500.0 kg)
- Goldshell KD6-SE 334% more heat output (1,808 vs 7,848 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 150% more home mining score (65.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Metric | Goldshell KD6-SE |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,016 |
| -$1.27 | Daily net profit | -$4.61 |
| -$584 | Net after 1 year | -$2,698 |
| -$1,049 | Net after 2 years | -$4,381 |
| -$1,513 | Net after 3 years | -$6,063 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX IIScore: 65/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KD6-SE90.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell KD6-SE: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX II is more profitable at $-1.27/day compared to $-4.61/day for the Goldshell KD6-SE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE-BOX II or Goldshell KD6-SE?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell KD6-SE at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell KD6-SE: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Goldshell KD6-SE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell KD6-SE: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II runs at 9,814,814.8 J/TH while the Goldshell KD6-SE runs at 90.9 J/TH — a difference of 9,814,723.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,814,814.8 vs 90.9 J/TH).