Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh vs Goldshell HS6 SE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh | Specification | Goldshell HS6 SE |
|---|---|---|
| 44.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 3.7 TH/s |
| 460 W | Power Consumption | 3,400 W |
| 10,454,545.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 918.9 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 2.6 kg | Weight | — |
| 1,570 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 69/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2b+sha3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh
Goldshell HS6 SE
Based on BTC price of $76,908 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell HS6 SE, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 8408991% more hashrate (0.0 vs 3.7 TH/s) in the Goldshell HS6 SE's favour. That said, the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh and Goldshell HS6 SE actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell HS6 SE 8408991% more hashrate (0.0 vs 3.7 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh 86% better power draw (460 vs 3,400 W)
- Goldshell HS6 SE 100% better efficiency (10,454,545 vs 919 J/TH)
- Goldshell HS6 SE 639% more heat output (1,570 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh 214% more home mining score (69.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh | Metric | Goldshell HS6 SE |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,060 |
| -$1.10 | Daily net profit | -$8.03 |
| -$523 | Net after 1 year | -$3,991 |
| -$926 | Net after 2 years | -$6,921 |
| -$1,329 | Net after 3 years | -$9,852 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44MhScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell HS6 SE918.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh or Goldshell HS6 SE more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh is more profitable at $-1.10/day compared to $-8.03/day for the Goldshell HS6 SE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh or Goldshell HS6 SE?
The Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell HS6 SE at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh or the Goldshell HS6 SE?
The Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell HS6 SE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh vs Goldshell HS6 SE: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh runs at 10,454,545.5 J/TH while the Goldshell HS6 SE runs at 918.9 J/TH — a difference of 10,453,626.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (10,454,545 vs 919 J/TH).