Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell HS6 SE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Specification | Goldshell HS6 SE |
|---|---|---|
| 54.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 3.7 TH/s |
| 530 W | Power Consumption | 3,400 W |
| 9,814,814.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 918.9 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 3.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 1,808 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2b+sha3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX II
Goldshell HS6 SE
Based on BTC price of $76,826 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell HS6 SE, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 6851752% more hashrate (0.0 vs 3.7 TH/s). The Goldshell AE-BOX II holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell HS6 SE diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell HS6 SE 6851752% more hashrate (0.0 vs 3.7 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 84% better power draw (530 vs 3,400 W)
- Goldshell HS6 SE 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 919 J/TH)
- Goldshell HS6 SE 541% more heat output (1,808 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 195% more home mining score (65.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Metric | Goldshell HS6 SE |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,060 |
| -$1.27 | Daily net profit | -$8.03 |
| -$584 | Net after 1 year | -$3,991 |
| -$1,049 | Net after 2 years | -$6,921 |
| -$1,513 | Net after 3 years | -$9,852 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX IIScore: 65/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell HS6 SE918.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell HS6 SE?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX II is more profitable at $-1.27/day compared to $-8.03/day for the Goldshell HS6 SE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE-BOX II or Goldshell HS6 SE?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell HS6 SE at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell HS6 SE: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell HS6 SE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell HS6 SE: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II runs at 9,814,814.8 J/TH while the Goldshell HS6 SE runs at 918.9 J/TH — a difference of 9,813,895.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 919 J/TH).