Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh vs Goldshell SC6 SE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh | Specification | Goldshell SC6 SE |
|---|---|---|
| 44.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 17.0 TH/s |
| 460 W | Power Consumption | 3,300 W |
| 10,454,545.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 194.1 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 2.6 kg | Weight | 11,500.0 kg |
| 1,570 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 69/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh
Goldshell SC6 SE
Based on BTC price of $77,152 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Goldshell SC6 SE wins on 3 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 38636264% more hashrate (0.0 vs 17.0 TH/s). That said, the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh and Goldshell SC6 SE diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell SC6 SE 38636264% more hashrate (0.0 vs 17.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh 86% better power draw (460 vs 3,300 W)
- Goldshell SC6 SE 100% better efficiency (10,454,545 vs 194 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh 100% better weight (2.6 vs 11,500.0 kg)
- Goldshell SC6 SE 617% more heat output (1,570 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh 214% more home mining score (69.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh | Metric | Goldshell SC6 SE |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,029 |
| -$1.10 | Daily net profit | -$7.32 |
| -$523 | Net after 1 year | -$3,699 |
| -$926 | Net after 2 years | -$6,370 |
| -$1,329 | Net after 3 years | -$9,040 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44MhScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC6 SE194.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh or the Goldshell SC6 SE?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh is more profitable at $-1.10/day compared to $-7.32/day for the Goldshell SC6 SE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh or Goldshell SC6 SE?
The Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell SC6 SE at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh or the Goldshell SC6 SE?
The Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell SC6 SE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh and Goldshell SC6 SE?
The Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh runs at 10,454,545.5 J/TH while the Goldshell SC6 SE runs at 194.1 J/TH — a difference of 10,454,351.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (10,454,545 vs 194 J/TH).