Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell SC6 SE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell SC6 SE |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 17.0 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 3,300 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 194.1 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 11,500.0 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell SC6 SE
Based on BTC price of $76,908 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell SC6 SE edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 3148048% more hashrate (0.0 vs 17.0 TH/s). That said, the Goldshell AE Max II isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell SC6 SE sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell SC6 SE 3148048% more hashrate (0.0 vs 17.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE Max II 3% better power draw (3,200 vs 3,300 W)
- Goldshell SC6 SE 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 194 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max II 100% better weight (12.5 vs 11,500.0 kg)
- Goldshell SC6 SE 3% more heat output (10,918 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max II 32% more home mining score (29.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell SC6 SE |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,029 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$7.32 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$3,700 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$6,371 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$9,043 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE Max IIScore: 29/100. 85 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC6 SE194.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell SC6 SE?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell SC6 SE is more profitable at $-7.32/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell SC6 SE?
The Goldshell AE Max II is quieter at 85 dB compared to the Goldshell SC6 SE at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell SC6 SE?
The Goldshell AE Max II scores 29/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell SC6 SE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell SC6 SE: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell SC6 SE runs at 194.1 J/TH — a difference of 5,925,731.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 194 J/TH).