Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell E-KA1M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Specification | Goldshell E-KA1M |
|---|---|---|
| 37.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 5.5 TH/s |
| 360 W | Power Consumption | 1,800 W |
| 9,729,729.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 327.3 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | 50 dB |
| 2.3 kg | Weight | — |
| 1,228 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,142 BTU/hr |
| 69/100 | Home Mining Score | 56/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX
Goldshell E-KA1M
Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Goldshell E-KA1M wins on 3 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 14864765% more hashrate (0.0 vs 5.5 TH/s). The Goldshell AE-BOX claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell E-KA1M diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell E-KA1M 14864765% more hashrate (0.0 vs 5.5 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 80% better power draw (360 vs 1,800 W)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 100% better efficiency (9,729,730 vs 327 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 30% better noise (35.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 400% more heat output (1,228 vs 6,142 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 23% more home mining score (69.0 vs 56.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Metric | Goldshell E-KA1M |
|---|---|---|
| $100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $910 |
| -$0.86 | Daily net profit | -$4.12 |
| -$415 | Net after 1 year | -$2,415 |
| -$731 | Net after 2 years | -$3,919 |
| -$1,046 | Net after 3 years | -$5,424 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOXScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell E-KA1M327.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell E-KA1M: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX is more profitable at $-0.86/day compared to $-4.12/day for the Goldshell E-KA1M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell E-KA1M: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE-BOX is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell E-KA1M at 50 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell E-KA1M: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AE-BOX scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 56/100 for the Goldshell E-KA1M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell E-KA1M?
The Goldshell AE-BOX runs at 9,729,729.7 J/TH while the Goldshell E-KA1M runs at 327.3 J/TH — a difference of 9,729,402.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,729,730 vs 327 J/TH).