Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell E-KA1M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Card | Specification | Goldshell E-KA1M |
|---|---|---|
| 5.5 MH/s | Hashrate | 5.5 TH/s |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 1,800 W |
| 11,818,181.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 327.3 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | 50 dB |
| 0.3 kg | Weight | — |
| 222 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,142 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 56/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Card
Goldshell E-KA1M
Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell E-KA1M comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 99999900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 5.5 TH/s). That said, the Goldshell AE Card isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Card and Goldshell E-KA1M sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell E-KA1M 99999900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 5.5 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE Card 96% better power draw (65.0 vs 1,800.0 W)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 100% better efficiency (11,818,182 vs 327 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Card 30% better noise (35.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 2669% more heat output (222 vs 6,142 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Card 27% more home mining score (71.0 vs 56.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Card | Metric | Goldshell E-KA1M |
|---|---|---|
| $99 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $910 |
| -$0.16 | Daily net profit | -$4.12 |
| -$156 | Net after 1 year | -$2,415 |
| -$213 | Net after 2 years | -$3,919 |
| -$270 | Net after 3 years | -$5,424 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE CardScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell E-KA1M327.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell E-KA1M: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE Card is more profitable at $-0.16/day compared to $-4.12/day for the Goldshell E-KA1M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Card or Goldshell E-KA1M?
The Goldshell AE Card is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell E-KA1M at 50 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Card or Goldshell E-KA1M?
The Goldshell AE Card scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 56/100 for the Goldshell E-KA1M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Card and Goldshell E-KA1M?
The Goldshell AE Card runs at 11,818,181.8 J/TH while the Goldshell E-KA1M runs at 327.3 J/TH — a difference of 11,817,854.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (11,818,182 vs 327 J/TH).