Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell HS5
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Specification | Goldshell HS5 |
|---|---|---|
| 37.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 2.7 TH/s |
| 360 W | Power Consumption | 2,650 W |
| 9,729,729.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 981.5 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 2.3 kg | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 1,228 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 9,042 BTU/hr |
| 69/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX
Goldshell HS5
Based on BTC price of $76,909 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell HS5, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 7297197% more hashrate (0.0 vs 2.7 TH/s) in the Goldshell HS5's favour. That said, the Goldshell AE-BOX isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell HS5 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell HS5 7297197% more hashrate (0.0 vs 2.7 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 86% better power draw (360 vs 2,650 W)
- Goldshell HS5 100% better efficiency (9,729,730 vs 981 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 100% better weight (2.3 vs 8,500.0 kg)
- Goldshell HS5 636% more heat output (1,228 vs 9,042 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 214% more home mining score (69.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Metric | Goldshell HS5 |
|---|---|---|
| $100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $949 |
| -$0.86 | Daily net profit | -$6.26 |
| -$415 | Net after 1 year | -$3,236 |
| -$731 | Net after 2 years | -$5,522 |
| -$1,046 | Net after 3 years | -$7,809 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOXScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell HS5981.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell HS5: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX is more profitable at $-0.86/day compared to $-6.26/day for the Goldshell HS5. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell HS5: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE-BOX is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell HS5 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell HS5: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AE-BOX scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell HS5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell HS5: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE-BOX runs at 9,729,729.7 J/TH while the Goldshell HS5 runs at 981.5 J/TH — a difference of 9,728,748.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,729,730 vs 981 J/TH).