Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Goldshell AE-BOX

Goldshell AE-BOX

Hashrate 37.0 MH/s Power 360 W Efficiency 9,729,729.7 J/TH
VS
Goldshell X6S

Goldshell X6S

Hashrate 1.8 GH/s Power 2,250 W Efficiency 1,264,044.9 J/TH

Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell X6S

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Goldshell AE-BOX Specification Goldshell X6S
37.0 MH/s Hashrate 1.8 GH/s
360 W Power Consumption 2,250 W
9,729,729.7 J/TH Efficiency 1,264,044.9 J/TH
35 dB Noise Level
2.3 kg Weight 5.0 kg
1,228 BTU/hr BTU Output 7,677 BTU/hr
69/100 Home Mining Score 26/100
Release Year
Zksnark Algorithm Scrypt
Goldshell Manufacturer Goldshell

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Goldshell AE-BOX

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.86
Daily Profit -$0.86
Monthly -$25.92
Yearly -$315.36

Goldshell X6S

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$5.40
Daily Profit -$5.40
Monthly -$162.00
Yearly -$1,970.98

Based on BTC price of $78,184 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell X6S edges it: 2 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 4711% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Goldshell AE-BOX holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Goldshell X6S — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell X6S actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Goldshell X6S 4711% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Goldshell AE-BOX 84% better power draw (360 vs 2,250 W)
  • Goldshell X6S 87% better efficiency (9,729,730 vs 1,264,045 J/TH)
  • Goldshell AE-BOX 54% better weight (2.3 vs 5.0 kg)
  • Goldshell X6S 525% more heat output (1,228 vs 7,677 BTU/hr)
  • Goldshell AE-BOX 165% more home mining score (69.0 vs 26.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Goldshell AE-BOX Metric Goldshell X6S
$100 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$0.86 Daily net profit -$5.40
-$415 Net after 1 year -$1,971
-$731 Net after 2 years -$3,942
-$1,046 Net after 3 years -$5,913
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Goldshell AE-BOX

Score: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Goldshell X6S

1,264,044.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Goldshell AE-BOX or Goldshell X6S more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX is more profitable at $-0.86/day compared to $-5.40/day for the Goldshell X6S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell X6S: which runs at a lower noise level?

The Goldshell AE-BOX is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell X6S at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE-BOX or Goldshell X6S?

The Goldshell AE-BOX scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Goldshell X6S). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell X6S: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Goldshell AE-BOX runs at 9,729,729.7 J/TH while the Goldshell X6S runs at 1,264,044.9 J/TH — a difference of 8,465,684.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 87% better efficiency (9,729,730 vs 1,264,045 J/TH).