Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell X6S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell X6S |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 1.8 GH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 2,250 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,264,044.9 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 5.0 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,677 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Scrypt |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell X6S
Based on BTC price of $78,184 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell X6S comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption). Where it pulls away hardest is 79% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 1,264,045 J/TH). That said, the Goldshell AE Max II isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell X6S diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell X6S 230% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell X6S 30% better power draw (3,200 vs 2,250 W)
- Goldshell X6S 79% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 1,264,045 J/TH)
- Goldshell X6S 60% better weight (12.5 vs 5.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max II 42% more heat output (10,918 vs 7,677 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max II 12% more home mining score (29.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell X6S |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$5.40 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$1,971 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$3,942 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$5,913 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE Max IIScore: 29/100. 85 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell X6S1,264,044.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell X6S: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell X6S is more profitable at $-5.40/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell X6S?
The Goldshell AE Max II is quieter at 85 dB compared to the Goldshell X6S at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell X6S?
The Goldshell AE Max II scores 29/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Goldshell X6S). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell X6S: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell X6S runs at 1,264,044.9 J/TH — a difference of 4,661,881.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 79% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 1,264,045 J/TH).