Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Goldshell AE Card

Goldshell AE Card

Hashrate 5.5 MH/s Power 65 W Efficiency 11,818,181.8 J/TH
VS
Goldshell Byte

Goldshell Byte

Hashrate 5.5 MH/s Power 140 W Efficiency 25,454,545.5 J/TH

Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell Byte

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Goldshell AE Card Specification Goldshell Byte
5.5 MH/s Hashrate 5.5 MH/s
65 W Power Consumption 140 W
11,818,181.8 J/TH Efficiency 25,454,545.5 J/TH
35 dB Noise Level 35 dB
0.3 kg Weight 0.4 kg
222 BTU/hr BTU Output 478 BTU/hr
71/100 Home Mining Score 65/100
Release Year
Zksnark Algorithm Zksnark
Goldshell Manufacturer Goldshell

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Goldshell AE Card

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.16
Daily Profit -$0.16
Monthly -$4.68
Yearly -$56.94

Goldshell Byte

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.34
Daily Profit -$0.34
Monthly -$10.08
Yearly -$122.64

Based on BTC price of $78,265 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Goldshell AE Card wins on 3 of 4 factors (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score). Its biggest concrete edge: 54% better power draw (65.0 vs 140.0 W). The Goldshell Byte claws back ground on price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Goldshell AE Card — wins on 3 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Card and Goldshell Byte sit on each measurable spec:

  • Goldshell AE Card 54% better power draw (65.0 vs 140.0 W)
  • Goldshell AE Card 54% better efficiency (11,818,182 vs 25,454,545 J/TH)
  • Goldshell AE Card 19% better weight (0.3 vs 0.4 kg)
  • Goldshell Byte 115% more heat output (222 vs 478 BTU/hr)
  • Goldshell AE Card 9% more home mining score (71.0 vs 65.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Goldshell AE Card Metric Goldshell Byte
$99 Upfront cost (MSRP) $59
-$0.16 Daily net profit -$0.34
-$156 Net after 1 year -$182
-$213 Net after 2 years -$304
-$270 Net after 3 years -$427
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Goldshell AE Card

Score: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Goldshell AE Card

11,818,181.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Goldshell AE Card or Goldshell Byte more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE Card is more profitable at $-0.16/day compared to $-0.34/day for the Goldshell Byte. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Goldshell AE Card or the Goldshell Byte better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Card or Goldshell Byte?

The Goldshell AE Card scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 65/100 for the Goldshell Byte). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Card and Goldshell Byte?

The Goldshell AE Card runs at 11,818,181.8 J/TH while the Goldshell Byte runs at 25,454,545.5 J/TH — a difference of 13,636,363.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 54% better efficiency (11,818,182 vs 25,454,545 J/TH).