Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell Byte
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell Byte |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 5.5 MH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 140 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 25,454,545.5 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 0.4 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 478 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 65/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Zksnark |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell Byte
Based on BTC price of $78,265 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
The Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell Byte finish in a near dead heat in our weighted scoring. There is no wrong answer here — let your electricity rate, noise tolerance and budget break the tie using the breakdowns above.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell Byte sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell AE Max II 9718% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell Byte 96% better power draw (3,200 vs 140 W)
- Goldshell AE Max II 77% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 25,454,545 J/TH)
- Goldshell Byte 59% better noise (85.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- Goldshell Byte 97% better weight (12.5 vs 0.4 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max II 2186% more heat output (10,918 vs 478 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell Byte 124% more home mining score (29.0 vs 65.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell Byte |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $59 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$0.34 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$182 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$304 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$427 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell ByteScore: 65/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell AE Max II5,925,925.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell Byte: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell Byte is more profitable at $-0.34/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell Byte: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell Byte is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell AE Max II at 85 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell Byte?
The Goldshell Byte scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Goldshell AE Max II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell Byte?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell Byte runs at 25,454,545.5 J/TH — a difference of 19,528,619.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 77% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 25,454,545 J/TH).