Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Goldshell AE Max

Goldshell AE Max

Hashrate 360.0 MH/s Power 3,300 W Efficiency 9,166,666.7 J/TH
VS
Goldshell Byte

Goldshell Byte

Hashrate 5.5 MH/s Power 140 W Efficiency 25,454,545.5 J/TH

Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell Byte

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Goldshell AE Max Specification Goldshell Byte
360.0 MH/s Hashrate 5.5 MH/s
3,300 W Power Consumption 140 W
9,166,666.7 J/TH Efficiency 25,454,545.5 J/TH
55 dB Noise Level 35 dB
13.5 kg Weight 0.4 kg
11,260 BTU/hr BTU Output 478 BTU/hr
50/100 Home Mining Score 65/100
Release Year
Zksnark Algorithm Zksnark
Goldshell Manufacturer Goldshell

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Goldshell AE Max

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$7.92
Daily Profit -$7.92
Monthly -$237.60
Yearly -$2,890.80

Goldshell Byte

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.34
Daily Profit -$0.34
Monthly -$10.08
Yearly -$122.64

Based on BTC price of $78,265 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Both the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell Byte are closely matched across our scoring factors, with neither holding a decisive advantage. Your choice should depend on your specific priorities — review the specs and profitability analysis above.

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell Byte sit on each measurable spec:

  • Goldshell AE Max 6445% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Goldshell Byte 96% better power draw (3,300 vs 140 W)
  • Goldshell AE Max 64% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 25,454,545 J/TH)
  • Goldshell Byte 36% better noise (55.0 vs 35.0 dB)
  • Goldshell Byte 97% better weight (13.5 vs 0.4 kg)
  • Goldshell AE Max 2257% more heat output (11,260 vs 478 BTU/hr)
  • Goldshell Byte 30% more home mining score (50.0 vs 65.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Goldshell AE Max Metric Goldshell Byte
$870 Upfront cost (MSRP) $59
-$7.92 Daily net profit -$0.34
-$3,761 Net after 1 year -$182
-$6,652 Net after 2 years -$304
-$9,542 Net after 3 years -$427
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Goldshell Byte

Score: 65/100. 35 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Goldshell AE Max

9,166,666.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell Byte: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell Byte is more profitable at $-0.34/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell Byte: which runs at a lower noise level?

The Goldshell Byte is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell AE Max at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell Byte: which fits a residential setup better?

The Goldshell Byte scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 50/100 for the Goldshell AE Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell Byte on J/TH?

The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell Byte runs at 25,454,545.5 J/TH — a difference of 16,287,878.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 64% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 25,454,545 J/TH).