Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell KA BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Card | Specification | Goldshell KA BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 5.5 MH/s | Hashrate | 1.2 TH/s |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 400 W |
| 11,818,181.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 339.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | 55 dB |
| 0.3 kg | Weight | 2.6 kg |
| 222 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Card
Goldshell KA BOX
Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Goldshell KA BOX wins on 3 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 21454445% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.2 TH/s). The Goldshell AE Card claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE Card and Goldshell KA BOX actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell KA BOX 21454445% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.2 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE Card 84% better power draw (65.0 vs 400.0 W)
- Goldshell KA BOX 100% better efficiency (11,818,182 vs 339 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Card 36% better noise (35.0 vs 55.0 dB)
- Goldshell AE Card 88% better weight (0.3 vs 2.6 kg)
- Goldshell KA BOX 515% more heat output (222 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Card 15% more home mining score (71.0 vs 62.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Card | Metric | Goldshell KA BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $99 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $305 |
| -$0.16 | Daily net profit | -$0.92 |
| -$156 | Net after 1 year | -$640 |
| -$213 | Net after 2 years | -$975 |
| -$270 | Net after 3 years | -$1,310 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE CardScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KA BOX339.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell KA BOX: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE Card is more profitable at $-0.16/day compared to $-0.92/day for the Goldshell KA BOX. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE Card or the Goldshell KA BOX better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE Card is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell KA BOX at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Card or Goldshell KA BOX?
The Goldshell AE Card scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 62/100 for the Goldshell KA BOX). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Card and Goldshell KA BOX?
The Goldshell AE Card runs at 11,818,181.8 J/TH while the Goldshell KA BOX runs at 339.0 J/TH — a difference of 11,817,842.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (11,818,182 vs 339 J/TH).