Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell KA BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell KA BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 1.2 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 400 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 339.0 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Noise Level | 55 dB |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 2.6 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell KA BOX
Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell KA BOX, which leads on 6 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 339 J/TH). Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell KA BOX diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell KA BOX 218419% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.2 TH/s)
- Goldshell KA BOX 88% better power draw (3,200 vs 400 W)
- Goldshell KA BOX 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 339 J/TH)
- Goldshell KA BOX 35% better noise (85.0 vs 55.0 dB)
- Goldshell KA BOX 79% better weight (12.5 vs 2.6 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max II 700% more heat output (10,918 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell KA BOX 114% more home mining score (29.0 vs 62.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell KA BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $305 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$0.92 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$640 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$975 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$1,310 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell KA BOXScore: 62/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KA BOX339.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell KA BOX more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KA BOX is more profitable at $-0.92/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell KA BOX better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell KA BOX is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Goldshell AE Max II at 85 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell KA BOX?
The Goldshell KA BOX scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Goldshell AE Max II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell KA BOX: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell KA BOX runs at 339.0 J/TH — a difference of 5,925,587.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 339 J/TH).