Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell KA BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell KA BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 1.2 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 400 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 339.0 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | 55 dB |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 2.6 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,365 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell KA BOX
Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell KA BOX, which leads on 5 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 339 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell KA BOX diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell KA BOX 327678% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.2 TH/s)
- Goldshell KA BOX 88% better power draw (3,300 vs 400 W)
- Goldshell KA BOX 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 339 J/TH)
- Goldshell KA BOX 81% better weight (13.5 vs 2.6 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 725% more heat output (11,260 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell KA BOX 24% more home mining score (50.0 vs 62.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell KA BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $305 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$0.92 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$640 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$975 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$1,310 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell KA BOXScore: 62/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KA BOX339.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell KA BOX: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KA BOX is more profitable at $-0.92/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell KA BOX: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell KA BOX?
The Goldshell KA BOX scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 50/100 for the Goldshell AE Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell KA BOX on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell KA BOX runs at 339.0 J/TH — a difference of 9,166,327.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 339 J/TH).