Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell AL MAX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell AL MAX |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 8.3 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 3,350 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 403.6 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Noise Level | 45 dB |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,430 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 50/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell AL MAX
Based on BTC price of $78,253 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell AL MAX, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 1536937% more hashrate (0.0 vs 8.3 TH/s). The Goldshell AE Max II holds the edge in power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell AL MAX sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell AL MAX 1536937% more hashrate (0.0 vs 8.3 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE Max II 4% better power draw (3,200 vs 3,350 W)
- Goldshell AL MAX 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 404 J/TH)
- Goldshell AL MAX 47% better noise (85.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Goldshell AE Max II 8% better weight (12.5 vs 13.5 kg)
- Goldshell AL MAX 5% more heat output (10,918 vs 11,430 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AL MAX 72% more home mining score (29.0 vs 50.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell AL MAX |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,370 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$7.74 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$5,196 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$8,021 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$10,847 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AL MAXScore: 50/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell AL MAX403.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell AL MAX more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE Max II is more profitable at $-7.68/day compared to $-7.74/day for the Goldshell AL MAX. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell AL MAX: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AL MAX is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Goldshell AE Max II at 85 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell AL MAX: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AL MAX scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Goldshell AE Max II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell AL MAX?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell AL MAX runs at 403.6 J/TH — a difference of 5,925,522.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 404 J/TH).