Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell AL MAX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Specification | Goldshell AL MAX |
|---|---|---|
| 54.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 8.3 TH/s |
| 530 W | Power Consumption | 3,350 W |
| 9,814,814.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 403.6 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | 45 dB |
| 3.0 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 1,808 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,430 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 50/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX II
Goldshell AL MAX
Based on BTC price of $78,253 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell AL MAX comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 15370270% more hashrate (0.0 vs 8.3 TH/s). That said, the Goldshell AE-BOX II isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell AL MAX diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell AL MAX 15370270% more hashrate (0.0 vs 8.3 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 84% better power draw (530 vs 3,350 W)
- Goldshell AL MAX 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 404 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 22% better noise (35.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 78% better weight (3.0 vs 13.5 kg)
- Goldshell AL MAX 532% more heat output (1,808 vs 11,430 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 30% more home mining score (65.0 vs 50.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Metric | Goldshell AL MAX |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,370 |
| -$1.27 | Daily net profit | -$7.74 |
| -$584 | Net after 1 year | -$5,196 |
| -$1,049 | Net after 2 years | -$8,021 |
| -$1,513 | Net after 3 years | -$10,847 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX IIScore: 65/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell AL MAX403.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell AL MAX: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX II is more profitable at $-1.27/day compared to $-7.74/day for the Goldshell AL MAX. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell AL MAX: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell AL MAX at 45 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell AL MAX?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 50/100 for the Goldshell AL MAX). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell AL MAX?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II runs at 9,814,814.8 J/TH while the Goldshell AL MAX runs at 403.6 J/TH — a difference of 9,814,411.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 404 J/TH).