Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell CK6
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell CK6 |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 19.3 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 3,300 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 171.0 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell CK6
Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell CK6, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 3573974% more hashrate (0.0 vs 19.3 TH/s). That said, the Goldshell AE Max II isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell CK6 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell CK6 3573974% more hashrate (0.0 vs 19.3 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE Max II 3% better power draw (3,200 vs 3,300 W)
- Goldshell CK6 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 171 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max II 100% better weight (12.5 vs 8,500.0 kg)
- Goldshell CK6 3% more heat output (10,918 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max II 32% more home mining score (29.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell CK6 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $799 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$7.23 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$3,436 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$6,073 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$8,711 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE Max IIScore: 29/100. 85 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK6171.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell CK6?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK6 is more profitable at $-7.23/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell CK6: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE Max II is quieter at 85 dB compared to the Goldshell CK6 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell CK6?
The Goldshell AE Max II scores 29/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell CK6). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell CK6 on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell CK6 runs at 171.0 J/TH — a difference of 5,925,755.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 171 J/TH).