Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Goldshell AE Max

Goldshell AE Max

Hashrate 360.0 MH/s Power 3,300 W Efficiency 9,166,666.7 J/TH
VS
Goldshell CK6

Goldshell CK6

Hashrate 19.3 TH/s Power 3,300 W Efficiency 171.0 J/TH

Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell CK6

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Goldshell AE Max Specification Goldshell CK6
360.0 MH/s Hashrate 19.3 TH/s
3,300 W Power Consumption 3,300 W
9,166,666.7 J/TH Efficiency 171.0 J/TH
55 dB Noise Level
13.5 kg Weight 8,500.0 kg
11,260 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,260 BTU/hr
50/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
Zksnark Algorithm Eaglesong
Goldshell Manufacturer Goldshell

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Goldshell AE Max

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$7.92
Daily Profit -$7.92
Monthly -$237.60
Yearly -$2,890.80

Goldshell CK6

Daily Revenue 0.00000888 BTC $0.69
Daily Electricity -$7.92
Daily Profit -$7.23
Monthly -$216.76
Yearly -$2,637.24

Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell CK6 edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 171 J/TH). The Goldshell AE Max holds the edge in home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Goldshell CK6 — wins on 3 of 5 factors

Spec Deltas

The Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell CK6 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Goldshell CK6 5361011% more hashrate (0.0 vs 19.3 TH/s)
  • Goldshell CK6 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 171 J/TH)
  • Goldshell AE Max 100% better weight (13.5 vs 8,500.0 kg)
  • Goldshell AE Max 127% more home mining score (50.0 vs 22.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Goldshell AE Max Metric Goldshell CK6
$870 Upfront cost (MSRP) $799
-$7.92 Daily net profit -$7.23
-$3,761 Net after 1 year -$3,436
-$6,652 Net after 2 years -$6,073
-$9,542 Net after 3 years -$8,711
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Goldshell AE Max

Score: 50/100. 55 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Goldshell CK6

171.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell CK6 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK6 is more profitable at $-7.23/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell CK6?

The Goldshell AE Max is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Goldshell CK6 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell CK6?

The Goldshell AE Max scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell CK6). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell CK6?

The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell CK6 runs at 171.0 J/TH — a difference of 9,166,495.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 171 J/TH).