Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell CK6
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Specification | Goldshell CK6 |
|---|---|---|
| 54.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 19.3 TH/s |
| 530 W | Power Consumption | 3,300 W |
| 9,814,814.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 171.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 3.0 kg | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 1,808 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX II
Goldshell CK6
Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell CK6 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 35740641% more hashrate (0.0 vs 19.3 TH/s) in the Goldshell CK6's favour. The Goldshell AE-BOX II claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell CK6 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell CK6 35740641% more hashrate (0.0 vs 19.3 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 84% better power draw (530 vs 3,300 W)
- Goldshell CK6 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 171 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 100% better weight (3.0 vs 8,500.0 kg)
- Goldshell CK6 523% more heat output (1,808 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 195% more home mining score (65.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Metric | Goldshell CK6 |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $799 |
| -$1.27 | Daily net profit | -$7.23 |
| -$584 | Net after 1 year | -$3,436 |
| -$1,049 | Net after 2 years | -$6,073 |
| -$1,513 | Net after 3 years | -$8,711 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX IIScore: 65/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK6171.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell CK6: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX II is more profitable at $-1.27/day compared to $-7.23/day for the Goldshell CK6. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell CK6 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell CK6 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell CK6?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell CK6). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell CK6?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II runs at 9,814,814.8 J/TH while the Goldshell CK6 runs at 171.0 J/TH — a difference of 9,814,643.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 171 J/TH).