Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell HS Lite
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell HS Lite |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 1.4 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 1,250 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 919.1 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 8,100.0 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,265 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell HS Lite
Based on BTC price of $76,909 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell HS Lite edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, price-performance). The standout gap is 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 919 J/TH) in the Goldshell HS Lite's favour. The Goldshell AE Max II holds the edge in noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell HS Lite diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell HS Lite 251752% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.4 TH/s)
- Goldshell HS Lite 61% better power draw (3,200 vs 1,250 W)
- Goldshell HS Lite 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 919 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max II 100% better weight (12.5 vs 8,100.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max II 156% more heat output (10,918 vs 4,265 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell HS Lite 7% more home mining score (29.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell HS Lite |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $630 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$2.95 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$1,707 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$2,785 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$3,862 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell HS LiteScore: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell HS Lite919.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell HS Lite?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS Lite is more profitable at $-2.95/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell HS Lite: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE Max II is quieter at 85 dB compared to the Goldshell HS Lite at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell HS Lite?
The Goldshell HS Lite scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Goldshell AE Max II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell HS Lite on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell HS Lite runs at 919.1 J/TH — a difference of 5,925,006.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 919 J/TH).