Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell KD5
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell KD5 |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 18.0 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 2,250 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 125.0 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,677 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2s |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell KD5
Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell KD5 edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 125 J/TH). The Goldshell AE Max II claws back ground on home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell KD5 sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell KD5 3333233% more hashrate (0.0 vs 18.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell KD5 30% better power draw (3,200 vs 2,250 W)
- Goldshell KD5 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 125 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max II 100% better weight (12.5 vs 8,500.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max II 42% more heat output (10,918 vs 7,677 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max II 12% more home mining score (29.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell KD5 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,998 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$4.75 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$3,732 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$5,467 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$7,201 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE Max IIScore: 29/100. 85 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KD5125.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell KD5 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KD5 is more profitable at $-4.75/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell KD5: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE Max II is quieter at 85 dB compared to the Goldshell KD5 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell KD5?
The Goldshell AE Max II scores 29/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Goldshell KD5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell KD5 on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell KD5 runs at 125.0 J/TH — a difference of 5,925,800.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 125 J/TH).