Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell KD5
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell KD5 |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 18.0 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 2,250 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 125.0 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,677 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2s |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell KD5
Based on BTC price of $78,265 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell KD5, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 125 J/TH). The Goldshell AE Max claws back ground on home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell KD5 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell KD5 4999900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 18.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell KD5 32% better power draw (3,300 vs 2,250 W)
- Goldshell KD5 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 125 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max 100% better weight (13.5 vs 8,500.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 47% more heat output (11,260 vs 7,677 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max 92% more home mining score (50.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell KD5 |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,998 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$4.75 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$3,732 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$5,467 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$7,201 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE MaxScore: 50/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KD5125.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell KD5 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KD5 is more profitable at $-4.75/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell KD5?
The Goldshell AE Max is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Goldshell KD5 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell KD5: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AE Max scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Goldshell KD5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell KD5: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell KD5 runs at 125.0 J/TH — a difference of 9,166,541.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 125 J/TH).