Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell Mini-DOGE III
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell Mini-DOGE III |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 800.0 MH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 500 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 625,000.0 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | 55 dB |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 3.2 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,706 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Scrypt |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell Mini-DOGE III
Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 4 (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, price-performance). The standout gap is 93% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 625,000 J/TH) in the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III's favour. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell Mini-DOGE III diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE III 122% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE III 85% better power draw (3,300 vs 500 W)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE III 93% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 625,000 J/TH)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE III 76% better weight (13.5 vs 3.2 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 560% more heat output (11,260 vs 1,706 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell Mini-DOGE III 24% more home mining score (50.0 vs 62.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell Mini-DOGE III |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $499 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$1.20 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$937 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$1,375 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$1,813 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell Mini-DOGE IIIScore: 62/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell Mini-DOGE III625,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell Mini-DOGE III: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III is more profitable at $-1.20/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell Mini-DOGE III?
The Goldshell Mini-DOGE III scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 50/100 for the Goldshell AE Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell Mini-DOGE III on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell Mini-DOGE III runs at 625,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 8,541,666.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 93% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 625,000 J/TH).