Iceriver AE2 720Mh vs Goldshell E-AE1M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AE2 720Mh | Specification | Goldshell E-AE1M |
|---|---|---|
| 720.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 230.0 MH/s |
| 1,300 W | Power Consumption | 2,000 W |
| 1,805,555.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 8,695,652.2 J/TH |
| 60 dB | Noise Level | 45 dB |
| 15.5 kg | Weight | 15.2 kg |
| 4,436 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,824 BTU/hr |
| 52/100 | Home Mining Score | 56/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Zksnark |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AE2 720Mh
Goldshell E-AE1M
Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Iceriver AE2 720Mh wins on 3 of 5 factors (efficiency, power consumption, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 79% better efficiency (1,805,556 vs 8,695,652 J/TH). The Goldshell E-AE1M claws back ground on home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Iceriver AE2 720Mh and Goldshell E-AE1M sit on each measurable spec:
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 213% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 35% better power draw (1,300 vs 2,000 W)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 79% better efficiency (1,805,556 vs 8,695,652 J/TH)
- Goldshell E-AE1M 25% better noise (60.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Goldshell E-AE1M 2% better weight (15.5 vs 15.2 kg)
- Goldshell E-AE1M 54% more heat output (4,436 vs 6,824 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell E-AE1M 8% more home mining score (52.0 vs 56.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Iceriver AE2 720Mh | Metric | Goldshell E-AE1M |
|---|---|---|
| $1,595 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $630 |
| -$3.12 | Daily net profit | -$4.80 |
| -$2,734 | Net after 1 year | -$2,382 |
| -$3,873 | Net after 2 years | -$4,134 |
| -$5,011 | Net after 3 years | -$5,886 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell E-AE1MScore: 56/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver AE2 720Mh1,805,555.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Iceriver AE2 720Mh vs Goldshell E-AE1M: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver AE2 720Mh is more profitable at $-3.12/day compared to $-4.80/day for the Goldshell E-AE1M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or Goldshell E-AE1M?
The Goldshell E-AE1M is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Iceriver AE2 720Mh at 60 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or Goldshell E-AE1M?
The Goldshell E-AE1M scores 56/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 52/100 for the Iceriver AE2 720Mh). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Iceriver AE2 720Mh and Goldshell E-AE1M on J/TH?
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh runs at 1,805,555.6 J/TH while the Goldshell E-AE1M runs at 8,695,652.2 J/TH — a difference of 6,890,096.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 79% better efficiency (1,805,556 vs 8,695,652 J/TH).