Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) vs Iceriver ALPH AL0
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) | Specification | Iceriver ALPH AL0 |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 400.0 GH/s |
| 180 W | Power Consumption | 100 W |
| 500.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 250.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 50 dB |
| 2.2 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 614 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 33/100 | Home Mining Score | 64/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)
Iceriver ALPH AL0
Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver ALPH AL0, which leads on 6 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 50% better efficiency (500 vs 250 J/TH) in the Iceriver ALPH AL0's favour. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) and Iceriver ALPH AL0 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Iceriver ALPH AL0 11% more hashrate (0.4 vs 0.4 TH/s)
- Iceriver ALPH AL0 44% better power draw (180 vs 100 W)
- Iceriver ALPH AL0 50% better efficiency (500 vs 250 J/TH)
- Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) 12% better weight (2.2 vs 2.5 kg)
- Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) 80% more heat output (614 vs 341 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver ALPH AL0 94% more home mining score (33.0 vs 64.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) | Metric | Iceriver ALPH AL0 |
|---|---|---|
| $340 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $178 |
| -$0.42 | Daily net profit | -$0.23 |
| -$493 | Net after 1 year | -$260 |
| -$646 | Net after 2 years | -$343 |
| -$799 | Net after 3 years | -$425 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver ALPH AL0Score: 64/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver ALPH AL0250.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) or Iceriver ALPH AL0 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver ALPH AL0 is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-0.42/day for the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) vs Iceriver ALPH AL0: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Iceriver ALPH AL0 is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) vs Iceriver ALPH AL0: which fits a residential setup better?
The Iceriver ALPH AL0 scores 64/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 33/100 for the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) and Iceriver ALPH AL0 on J/TH?
The Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) runs at 500.0 J/TH while the Iceriver ALPH AL0 runs at 250.0 J/TH — a difference of 250.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 50% better efficiency (500 vs 250 J/TH).