Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) vs Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) | Specification | Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 2.0 TH/s |
| 180 W | Power Consumption | 500 W |
| 500.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 250.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 45 dB |
| 2.2 kg | Weight | 5.0 kg |
| 614 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,706 BTU/hr |
| 33/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)
Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE
Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 456% more hashrate (0.4 vs 2.0 TH/s). The Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) claws back ground on power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) and Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE 456% more hashrate (0.4 vs 2.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) 64% better power draw (180 vs 500 W)
- Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE 50% better efficiency (500 vs 250 J/TH)
- Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) 56% better weight (2.2 vs 5.0 kg)
- Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE 178% more heat output (614 vs 1,706 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE 88% more home mining score (33.0 vs 62.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) | Metric | Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE |
|---|---|---|
| $340 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $538 |
| -$0.42 | Daily net profit | -$1.13 |
| -$493 | Net after 1 year | -$950 |
| -$646 | Net after 2 years | -$1,361 |
| -$799 | Net after 3 years | -$1,773 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITEScore: 62/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE250.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) or the Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) is more profitable at $-0.42/day compared to $-1.13/day for the Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) vs Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) vs Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE: which fits a residential setup better?
The Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 33/100 for the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) and Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE?
The Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) runs at 500.0 J/TH while the Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE runs at 250.0 J/TH — a difference of 250.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 50% better efficiency (500 vs 250 J/TH).