Goldshell AL Card vs colengine P2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AL Card | Specification | colengine P2 |
|---|---|---|
| 120.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 38.0 GH/s |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 1,458 W |
| 541.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 38,368.4 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | 80 dB |
| 3.3 kg | Weight | 14.8 kg |
| 222 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,975 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 38/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | colengine |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AL Card
colengine P2
Based on BTC price of $78,265 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell AL Card edges it: 6 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 99% better efficiency (542 vs 38,368 J/TH) in the Goldshell AL Card's favour. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AL Card and colengine P2 sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell AL Card 216% more hashrate (0.1 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AL Card 96% better power draw (65.0 vs 1,458.0 W)
- Goldshell AL Card 99% better efficiency (542 vs 38,368 J/TH)
- Goldshell AL Card 56% better noise (35.0 vs 80.0 dB)
- Goldshell AL Card 78% better weight (3.3 vs 14.8 kg)
- colengine P2 2143% more heat output (222 vs 4,975 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AL Card 87% more home mining score (71.0 vs 38.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AL Card | Metric | colengine P2 |
|---|---|---|
| $111 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,290 |
| -$0.15 | Daily net profit | -$3.50 |
| -$166 | Net after 1 year | -$2,567 |
| -$222 | Net after 2 years | -$3,843 |
| -$277 | Net after 3 years | -$5,120 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AL CardScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell AL Card541.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AL Card vs colengine P2: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AL Card is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-3.50/day for the colengine P2. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AL Card vs colengine P2: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AL Card is quieter at 35 dB compared to the colengine P2 at 80 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AL Card or colengine P2?
The Goldshell AL Card scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 38/100 for the colengine P2). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AL Card and colengine P2?
The Goldshell AL Card runs at 541.7 J/TH while the colengine P2 runs at 38,368.4 J/TH — a difference of 37,826.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficiency (542 vs 38,368 J/TH).