Antminer AL1 vs colengine P2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer AL1 | Specification | colengine P2 |
|---|---|---|
| 16.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 38.0 GH/s |
| 3,360 W | Power Consumption | 1,458 W |
| 210.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 38,368.4 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 80 dB |
| 14.5 kg | Weight | 14.8 kg |
| 11,464 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,975 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 38/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | Blake3 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | colengine |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer AL1
colengine P2
Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Antminer AL1 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, noise level, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 42005% more hashrate (16.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The colengine P2 claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer AL1 and colengine P2 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer AL1 42005% more hashrate (16.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- colengine P2 57% better power draw (3,360 vs 1,458 W)
- Antminer AL1 99% better efficiency (210 vs 38,368 J/TH)
- Antminer AL1 6% better noise (75.0 vs 80.0 dB)
- Antminer AL1 2% better weight (14.5 vs 14.8 kg)
- Antminer AL1 130% more heat output (11,464 vs 4,975 BTU/hr)
- colengine P2 6% more home mining score (36.0 vs 38.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer AL1 | Metric | colengine P2 |
|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,290 |
| -$7.49 | Daily net profit | -$3.50 |
| -$12,733 | Net after 1 year | -$2,567 |
| -$15,466 | Net after 2 years | -$3,843 |
| -$18,199 | Net after 3 years | -$5,120 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
colengine P2Score: 38/100. 80 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer AL1210.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer AL1 or colengine P2 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the colengine P2 is more profitable at $-3.50/day compared to $-7.49/day for the Antminer AL1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer AL1 or colengine P2?
The Antminer AL1 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the colengine P2 at 80 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer AL1 or the colengine P2?
The colengine P2 scores 38/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Antminer AL1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer AL1 vs colengine P2: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer AL1 runs at 210.0 J/TH while the colengine P2 runs at 38,368.4 J/TH — a difference of 38,158.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficiency (210 vs 38,368 J/TH).