Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) vs colengine P2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) | Specification | colengine P2 |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 38.0 GH/s |
| 180 W | Power Consumption | 1,458 W |
| 500.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 38,368.4 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 80 dB |
| 2.2 kg | Weight | 14.8 kg |
| 614 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,975 BTU/hr |
| 33/100 | Home Mining Score | 38/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | colengine |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)
colengine P2
Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). The standout gap is 99% better efficiency (500 vs 38,368 J/TH) in the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)'s favour. The colengine P2 holds the edge in home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) and colengine P2 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) 847% more hashrate (0.4 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) 88% better power draw (180 vs 1,458 W)
- Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) 99% better efficiency (500 vs 38,368 J/TH)
- Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) 85% better weight (2.2 vs 14.8 kg)
- colengine P2 710% more heat output (614 vs 4,975 BTU/hr)
- colengine P2 15% more home mining score (33.0 vs 38.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) | Metric | colengine P2 |
|---|---|---|
| $340 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,290 |
| -$0.42 | Daily net profit | -$3.50 |
| -$493 | Net after 1 year | -$2,567 |
| -$646 | Net after 2 years | -$3,843 |
| -$799 | Net after 3 years | -$5,120 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
colengine P2Score: 38/100. 80 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)500.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) or the colengine P2?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) is more profitable at $-0.42/day compared to $-3.50/day for the colengine P2. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) or the colengine P2 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The colengine P2 is quieter at 80 dB compared to the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) or colengine P2?
The colengine P2 scores 38/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 33/100 for the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) and colengine P2 on J/TH?
The Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) runs at 500.0 J/TH while the colengine P2 runs at 38,368.4 J/TH — a difference of 37,868.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficiency (500 vs 38,368 J/TH).