Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite vs Iceriver KS3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite | Specification | Iceriver KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| 300.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 8.0 TH/s |
| 500 W | Power Consumption | 3,200 W |
| 1,666,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 400.0 J/TH |
| 45 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 4.0 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 1,706 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 62/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite
Iceriver KS3
Based on BTC price of $78,153 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Iceriver KS3 edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 2666567% more hashrate (0.0 vs 8.0 TH/s) in the Iceriver KS3's favour. The Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite and Iceriver KS3 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Iceriver KS3 2666567% more hashrate (0.0 vs 8.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite 84% better power draw (500 vs 3,200 W)
- Iceriver KS3 100% better efficiency (1,666,667 vs 400 J/TH)
- Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite 40% better noise (45.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite 70% better weight (4.0 vs 13.5 kg)
- Iceriver KS3 540% more heat output (1,706 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite 72% more home mining score (62.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite | Metric | Iceriver KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| $979 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $730 |
| -$1.20 | Daily net profit | -$7.39 |
| -$1,417 | Net after 1 year | -$3,428 |
| -$1,855 | Net after 2 years | -$6,126 |
| -$2,293 | Net after 3 years | -$8,825 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver ALEO AE1 LiteScore: 62/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KS3400.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite vs Iceriver KS3: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite is more profitable at $-1.20/day compared to $-7.39/day for the Iceriver KS3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite vs Iceriver KS3: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Iceriver KS3 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite vs Iceriver KS3: which fits a residential setup better?
The Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver KS3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite and Iceriver KS3?
The Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite runs at 1,666,666.7 J/TH while the Iceriver KS3 runs at 400.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,666,266.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (1,666,667 vs 400 J/TH).