Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) vs Iceriver KS3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) | Specification | Iceriver KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 8.0 TH/s |
| 3,580 W | Power Consumption | 3,200 W |
| 1,790,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 400.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 15.0 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 12,215 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)
Iceriver KS3
Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Iceriver KS3 edges it: 5 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficiency (1,790,000 vs 400 J/TH). Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) and Iceriver KS3 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Iceriver KS3 399900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 8.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KS3 11% better power draw (3,580 vs 3,200 W)
- Iceriver KS3 100% better efficiency (1,790,000 vs 400 J/TH)
- Iceriver KS3 10% better weight (15.0 vs 13.5 kg)
- Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) 12% more heat output (12,215 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KS3 20% more home mining score (30.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) | Metric | Iceriver KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| $5,390 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $730 |
| -$8.59 | Daily net profit | -$7.39 |
| -$8,526 | Net after 1 year | -$3,428 |
| -$11,662 | Net after 2 years | -$6,126 |
| -$14,798 | Net after 3 years | -$8,825 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KS3Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KS3400.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) vs Iceriver KS3: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS3 is more profitable at $-7.39/day compared to $-8.59/day for the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) vs Iceriver KS3: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) or Iceriver KS3?
The Iceriver KS3 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) vs Iceriver KS3: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) runs at 1,790,000.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS3 runs at 400.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,789,600.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (1,790,000 vs 400 J/TH).