Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro vs Goldshell E-AL1M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro | Specification | Goldshell E-AL1M |
|---|---|---|
| 16.6 TH/s | Hashrate | 4.4 TH/s |
| 3,730 W | Power Consumption | 1,800 W |
| 224.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 409.1 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 13.6 kg | Weight | — |
| 12,727 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,142 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | Blake3 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro
Goldshell E-AL1M
Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro wins on 4 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 277% more hashrate (16.6 vs 4.4 TH/s). That said, the Goldshell E-AL1M isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and price-performance. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro and Goldshell E-AL1M actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro 277% more hashrate (16.6 vs 4.4 TH/s)
- Goldshell E-AL1M 52% better power draw (3,730 vs 1,800 W)
- Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro 45% better efficiency (225 vs 409 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro 107% more heat output (12,727 vs 6,142 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro 7% more home mining score (30.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro | Metric | Goldshell E-AL1M |
|---|---|---|
| $9,100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $799 |
| -$8.35 | Daily net profit | -$4.16 |
| -$12,149 | Net after 1 year | -$2,318 |
| -$15,199 | Net after 2 years | -$3,837 |
| -$18,248 | Net after 3 years | -$5,356 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer AL1 ProScore: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro224.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro vs Goldshell E-AL1M: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell E-AL1M is more profitable at $-4.16/day compared to $-8.35/day for the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro or the Goldshell E-AL1M better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Goldshell E-AL1M at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro or Goldshell E-AL1M?
The Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Goldshell E-AL1M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro and Goldshell E-AL1M on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro runs at 224.7 J/TH while the Goldshell E-AL1M runs at 409.1 J/TH — a difference of 184.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 45% better efficiency (225 vs 409 J/TH).