Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer AL1 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 16.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 18.0 TH/s |
| 3,360 W | Power Consumption | 1,728 W |
| 210.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 96.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 14.5 kg | Weight | 5,150.0 kg |
| 11,464 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 5,896 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer AL1
Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th)
Based on BTC price of $79,091 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th), which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption). The standout gap is 54% better efficiency (210.0 vs 96.0 J/TH) in the Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th)'s favour. The Antminer AL1 holds the edge in home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer AL1 and Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) 13% more hashrate (16.0 vs 18.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) 49% better power draw (3,360 vs 1,728 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) 54% better efficiency (210.0 vs 96.0 J/TH)
- Antminer AL1 100% better weight (14.5 vs 5,150.0 kg)
- Antminer AL1 94% more heat output (11,464 vs 5,896 BTU/hr)
- Antminer AL1 29% more home mining score (36.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Antminer AL1 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$7.48 | Daily net profit | -$3.49 |
| -$12,731 | Net after 1 year | -$1,275 |
| -$15,462 | Net after 2 years | -$2,549 |
| -$18,192 | Net after 3 years | -$3,824 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer AL1Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th)96.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) is more profitable at $-3.49/day compared to $-7.48/day for the Antminer AL1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th): which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer AL1 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer AL1 or the Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th)?
The Antminer AL1 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer AL1 runs at 210.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S9 Hydro (18Th) runs at 96.0 J/TH — a difference of 114.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 54% better efficiency (210.0 vs 96.0 J/TH).