Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Bitmain Antminer D3 (15Gh)

Bitmain Antminer D3 (15Gh)

Hashrate 15.0 GH/s Power 1,200 W Efficiency 80,000.0 J/TH
VS
Baikal BK-X

Baikal BK-X

Hashrate 10.0 GH/s Power 630 W Efficiency 63,000.0 J/TH

Bitmain Antminer D3 (15Gh) vs Baikal BK-X

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitmain Antminer D3 (15Gh) Specification Baikal BK-X
15.0 GH/s Hashrate 10.0 GH/s
1,200 W Power Consumption 630 W
80,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 63,000.0 J/TH
Noise Level
5,500.0 kg Weight 3,700.0 kg
4,094 BTU/hr BTU Output 2,150 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
X11 Algorithm X11
Bitmain Manufacturer Baikal

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitmain Antminer D3 (15Gh)

Daily Revenue 0.00000001 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$2.88
Daily Profit -$2.88
Monthly -$86.38
Yearly -$1,051.00

Baikal BK-X

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.51
Daily Profit -$1.51
Monthly -$45.35
Yearly -$551.75

Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Baikal BK-X edges it: 2 of 4 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption). Its biggest concrete edge: 48% better power draw (1,200 vs 630 W). That said, the Bitmain Antminer D3 (15Gh) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Baikal BK-X — wins on 2 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

The Bitmain Antminer D3 (15Gh) and Baikal BK-X diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Bitmain Antminer D3 (15Gh) 50% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Baikal BK-X 48% better power draw (1,200 vs 630 W)
  • Baikal BK-X 21% better efficiency (80,000 vs 63,000 J/TH)
  • Baikal BK-X 33% better weight (5,500 vs 3,700 kg)
  • Bitmain Antminer D3 (15Gh) 90% more heat output (4,094 vs 2,150 BTU/hr)
  • Bitmain Antminer D3 (15Gh) 3% more home mining score (31.0 vs 30.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Bitmain Antminer D3 (15Gh)

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Baikal BK-X

63,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Bitmain Antminer D3 (15Gh) or Baikal BK-X more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal BK-X is more profitable at $-1.51/day compared to $-2.88/day for the Bitmain Antminer D3 (15Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer D3 (15Gh) or Baikal BK-X?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Bitmain Antminer D3 (15Gh) vs Baikal BK-X: which fits a residential setup better?

The Bitmain Antminer D3 (15Gh) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Baikal BK-X). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer D3 (15Gh) and Baikal BK-X?

The Bitmain Antminer D3 (15Gh) runs at 80,000.0 J/TH while the Baikal BK-X runs at 63,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 17,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 21% better efficiency (80,000 vs 63,000 J/TH).