Antminer D9 vs Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer D9 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 1,770.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 64.0 TH/s |
| 2,839 W | Power Consumption | 3,200 W |
| 1,604.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 50.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | 10,000.0 kg |
| 9,687 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer D9
Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th)
Based on BTC price of $79,077 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 3516% more hashrate (1.8 vs 64.0 TH/s). The Antminer D9 holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer D9 and Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) 3516% more hashrate (1.8 vs 64.0 TH/s)
- Antminer D9 11% better power draw (2,839 vs 3,200 W)
- Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) 97% better efficiency (1,604.0 vs 50.0 J/TH)
- Antminer D9 100% better weight (16.1 vs 10,000.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) 13% more heat output (9,687 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
- Antminer D9 64% more home mining score (36.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer D9 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $75 |
| -$6.75 | Daily net profit | -$5.35 |
| -$5,463 | Net after 1 year | -$2,028 |
| -$7,927 | Net after 2 years | -$3,981 |
| -$10,390 | Net after 3 years | -$5,934 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer D9Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th)50.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer D9 vs Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) is more profitable at $-5.35/day compared to $-6.75/day for the Antminer D9. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer D9 or the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer D9 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer D9 or the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th)?
The Antminer D9 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer D9 vs Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer D9 runs at 1,604.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer T17+ (64Th) runs at 50.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,554.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 97% better efficiency (1,604.0 vs 50.0 J/TH).