Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) vs Baikal BK-B
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) | Specification | Baikal BK-B |
|---|---|---|
| 34.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 160.0 GH/s |
| 1,800 W | Power Consumption | 410 W |
| 52.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 2,562.5 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 9,400.0 kg | Weight | 3,800.0 kg |
| 6,142 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,399 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake256r14 | Algorithm | Blake256r14 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Baikal |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th)
Baikal BK-B
Based on BTC price of $78,124 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 4 (efficiency, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 21150% more hashrate (34.0 vs 0.2 TH/s). The Baikal BK-B claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) and Baikal BK-B diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) 21150% more hashrate (34.0 vs 0.2 TH/s)
- Baikal BK-B 77% better power draw (1,800 vs 410 W)
- Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) 98% better efficiency (52.9 vs 2,562.5 J/TH)
- Baikal BK-B 60% better weight (9,400 vs 3,800 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) 339% more heat output (6,142 vs 1,399 BTU/hr)
- Baikal BK-B 21% more home mining score (28.0 vs 34.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) | Metric | Baikal BK-B |
|---|---|---|
| $2,100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$3.10 | Daily net profit | -$0.98 |
| -$3,231 | Net after 1 year | -$357 |
| -$4,361 | Net after 2 years | -$714 |
| -$5,492 | Net after 3 years | -$1,071 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Baikal BK-BScore: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th)52.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) or the Baikal BK-B?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal BK-B is more profitable at $-0.98/day compared to $-3.10/day for the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) vs Baikal BK-B: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) vs Baikal BK-B: which fits a residential setup better?
The Baikal BK-B scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) and Baikal BK-B on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) runs at 52.9 J/TH while the Baikal BK-B runs at 2,562.5 J/TH — a difference of 2,509.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 98% better efficiency (52.9 vs 2,562.5 J/TH).