Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) vs Antminer K7
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) | Specification | Antminer K7 |
|---|---|---|
| 34.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 63.5 TH/s |
| 1,800 W | Power Consumption | 3,080 W |
| 52.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 48.5 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 9,400.0 kg | Weight | 14.0 kg |
| 6,142 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,509 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake256r14 | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th)
Antminer K7
Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Antminer K7 comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 87% more hashrate (34.0 vs 63.5 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) holds the edge in power consumption. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) and Antminer K7 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer K7 87% more hashrate (34.0 vs 63.5 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) 42% better power draw (1,800 vs 3,080 W)
- Antminer K7 8% better efficiency (52.9 vs 48.5 J/TH)
- Antminer K7 100% better weight (9,400.0 vs 14.0 kg)
- Antminer K7 71% more heat output (6,142 vs 10,509 BTU/hr)
- Antminer K7 29% more home mining score (28.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) | Metric | Antminer K7 |
|---|---|---|
| $2,100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,500 |
| -$3.10 | Daily net profit | -$5.11 |
| -$3,231 | Net after 1 year | -$5,365 |
| -$4,361 | Net after 2 years | -$7,229 |
| -$5,492 | Net after 3 years | -$9,094 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer K7Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer K748.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) or Antminer K7 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) is more profitable at $-3.10/day compared to $-5.11/day for the Antminer K7. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) or the Antminer K7 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer K7 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) or the Antminer K7?
The Antminer K7 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) and Antminer K7?
The Bitmain Antminer DR5 (34Th) runs at 52.9 J/TH while the Antminer K7 runs at 48.5 J/TH — a difference of 4.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 8% better efficiency (52.9 vs 48.5 J/TH).