Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) vs iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) | Specification | iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 |
|---|---|---|
| 9.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 330.0 MH/s |
| 2,340 W | Power Consumption | 240 W |
| 260,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 727,272.7 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 40 dB |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 2.4 kg |
| 7,984 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 819 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 66/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh)
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330
Based on BTC price of $78,209 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 2627% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh)'s favour. That said, the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) and iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) 2627% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 90% better power draw (2,340 vs 240 W)
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) 64% better efficiency (260,000 vs 727,273 J/TH)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 47% better noise (75.0 vs 40.0 dB)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 83% better weight (14.2 vs 2.4 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) 875% more heat output (7,984 vs 819 BTU/hr)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 65% more home mining score (40.0 vs 66.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) | Metric | iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 |
|---|---|---|
| $5,399 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $899 |
| -$5.62 | Daily net profit | -$0.58 |
| -$7,449 | Net after 1 year | -$1,109 |
| -$9,498 | Net after 2 years | -$1,319 |
| -$11,548 | Net after 3 years | -$1,530 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330Score: 66/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh)260,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) or iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-5.62/day for the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) or iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) or the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 40/100 for the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) and iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330?
The Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) runs at 260,000.0 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 runs at 727,272.7 J/TH — a difference of 467,272.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 64% better efficiency (260,000 vs 727,273 J/TH).