Antminer E9 Pro vs Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer E9 Pro | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U |
|---|---|---|
| 3,680.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 1.2 PH/s |
| 2,200 W | Power Consumption | 11,020 W |
| 597,826.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 9.5 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 50 dB |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | — |
| 7,506 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 37,600 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer E9 Pro
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U
Based on BTC price of $79,102 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 31521639% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1,160.0 TH/s). The Antminer E9 Pro holds the edge in power consumption. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer E9 Pro and Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U 31521639% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1,160.0 TH/s)
- Antminer E9 Pro 80% better power draw (2,200 vs 11,020 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U 100% better efficiency (597,826.1 vs 9.5 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U 33% better noise (75.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U 401% more heat output (7,506 vs 37,600 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U 10% more home mining score (40.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer E9 Pro | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $7,988 |
| -$5.28 | Daily net profit | $17.10 |
| -$4,927 | Net after 1 year | -$1,748 |
| -$6,854 | Net after 2 years | +$4,492 |
| -$8,781 | Net after 3 years | +$10,732 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Pays for itself in ~15 months at current rates |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U$22.38/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3UScore: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U9.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer E9 Pro vs Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U is more profitable at $17.10/day compared to $-5.28/day for the Antminer E9 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer E9 Pro or Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U?
The Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Antminer E9 Pro at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer E9 Pro vs Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 40/100 for the Antminer E9 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer E9 Pro vs Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer E9 Pro runs at 597,826.1 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S23 Hyd 3U runs at 9.5 J/TH — a difference of 597,816.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (597,826.1 vs 9.5 J/TH).