Antminer E9 Pro vs Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer E9 Pro | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 3,680.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 13.0 TH/s |
| 2,200 W | Power Consumption | 1,280 W |
| 597,826.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 98.5 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 4,200.0 kg |
| 7,506 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,367 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer E9 Pro
Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficiency (597,826.1 vs 98.5 J/TH). The Antminer E9 Pro holds the edge in home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer E9 Pro and Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) 353161% more hashrate (0.0 vs 13.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) 42% better power draw (2,200 vs 1,280 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) 100% better efficiency (597,826.1 vs 98.5 J/TH)
- Antminer E9 Pro 100% better weight (14.2 vs 4,200.0 kg)
- Antminer E9 Pro 72% more heat output (7,506 vs 4,367 BTU/hr)
- Antminer E9 Pro 29% more home mining score (40.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer E9 Pro | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $65 |
| -$5.28 | Daily net profit | -$2.60 |
| -$4,927 | Net after 1 year | -$1,015 |
| -$6,854 | Net after 2 years | -$1,966 |
| -$8,781 | Net after 3 years | -$2,916 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer E9 ProScore: 40/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th)98.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Antminer E9 Pro or the Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) is more profitable at $-2.60/day compared to $-5.28/day for the Antminer E9 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Antminer E9 Pro or Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th)?
The Antminer E9 Pro is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer E9 Pro vs Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th): which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer E9 Pro scores 40/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer E9 Pro and Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th)?
The Antminer E9 Pro runs at 597,826.1 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S9i (13Th) runs at 98.5 J/TH — a difference of 597,727.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (597,826.1 vs 98.5 J/TH).