Antminer E9 Pro vs Bitmain ANTMINER XMR Miner X9
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer E9 Pro | Specification | Bitmain ANTMINER XMR Miner X9 |
|---|---|---|
| 3,680.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 1,000.0 KH/s |
| 2,200 W | Power Consumption | 2,472 W |
| 597,826.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 2,472,000,000.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 76 dB |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 17.5 kg |
| 7,506 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,435 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 33/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | Randomx |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer E9 Pro
Bitmain ANTMINER XMR Miner X9
Based on BTC price of $77,041 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Antminer E9 Pro, which leads on 6 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficiency (597,826 vs 2,472,000,000 J/TH). Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer E9 Pro and Bitmain ANTMINER XMR Miner X9 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer E9 Pro 367900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Antminer E9 Pro 11% better power draw (2,200 vs 2,472 W)
- Antminer E9 Pro 100% better efficiency (597,826 vs 2,472,000,000 J/TH)
- Antminer E9 Pro 1% better noise (75.0 vs 76.0 dB)
- Antminer E9 Pro 19% better weight (14.2 vs 17.5 kg)
- Bitmain ANTMINER XMR Miner X9 12% more heat output (7,506 vs 8,435 BTU/hr)
- Antminer E9 Pro 21% more home mining score (40.0 vs 33.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer E9 Pro | Metric | Bitmain ANTMINER XMR Miner X9 |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,449 |
| -$5.28 | Daily net profit | -$5.93 |
| -$4,927 | Net after 1 year | -$7,614 |
| -$6,854 | Net after 2 years | -$9,780 |
| -$8,781 | Net after 3 years | -$11,945 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer E9 ProScore: 40/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer E9 Pro597,826.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer E9 Pro vs Bitmain ANTMINER XMR Miner X9: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer E9 Pro is more profitable at $-5.28/day compared to $-5.93/day for the Bitmain ANTMINER XMR Miner X9. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer E9 Pro or the Bitmain ANTMINER XMR Miner X9 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer E9 Pro is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain ANTMINER XMR Miner X9 at 76 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Antminer E9 Pro or the Bitmain ANTMINER XMR Miner X9?
The Antminer E9 Pro scores 40/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 33/100 for the Bitmain ANTMINER XMR Miner X9). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer E9 Pro and Bitmain ANTMINER XMR Miner X9 on J/TH?
The Antminer E9 Pro runs at 597,826.1 J/TH while the Bitmain ANTMINER XMR Miner X9 runs at 2,472,000,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 2,471,402,173.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (597,826 vs 2,472,000,000 J/TH).