Antminer E9 Pro vs Bitmain Antminer Z9
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer E9 Pro | Specification | Bitmain Antminer Z9 |
|---|---|---|
| 3,680.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 42.0 Ksol/s |
| 2,200 W | Power Consumption | 970 W |
| 597,826.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 23.1 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 4,700.0 kg |
| 7,506 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 3,310 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | Equihash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer E9 Pro
Bitmain Antminer Z9
Based on BTC price of $78,175 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer Z9, which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficiency (597,826.1 vs 23.1 J/TH). That said, the Antminer E9 Pro isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins home mining score and noise level. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer E9 Pro and Bitmain Antminer Z9 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer Z9 1141204% more hashrate (0.0 vs 42.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer Z9 56% better power draw (2,200 vs 970 W)
- Bitmain Antminer Z9 100% better efficiency (597,826.1 vs 23.1 J/TH)
- Antminer E9 Pro 100% better weight (14.2 vs 4,700.0 kg)
- Antminer E9 Pro 127% more heat output (7,506 vs 3,310 BTU/hr)
- Antminer E9 Pro 29% more home mining score (40.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer E9 Pro | Metric | Bitmain Antminer Z9 |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$5.28 | Daily net profit | -$0.82 |
| -$4,927 | Net after 1 year | -$298 |
| -$6,854 | Net after 2 years | -$596 |
| -$8,781 | Net after 3 years | -$895 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer E9 ProScore: 40/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer Z923.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer E9 Pro vs Bitmain Antminer Z9: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer Z9 is more profitable at $-0.82/day compared to $-5.28/day for the Antminer E9 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Antminer E9 Pro vs Bitmain Antminer Z9: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer E9 Pro is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer Z9 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer E9 Pro or Bitmain Antminer Z9?
The Antminer E9 Pro scores 40/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer Z9). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer E9 Pro vs Bitmain Antminer Z9: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer E9 Pro runs at 597,826.1 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer Z9 runs at 23.1 J/TH — a difference of 597,803.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (597,826.1 vs 23.1 J/TH).