Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer Z9
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer AL1 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer Z9 |
|---|---|---|
| 16.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 42.0 Ksol/s |
| 3,360 W | Power Consumption | 970 W |
| 210.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 23.1 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 14.5 kg | Weight | 4,700.0 kg |
| 11,464 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 3,310 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithm | Equihash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer AL1
Bitmain Antminer Z9
Based on BTC price of $78,175 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer Z9, which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption). Its biggest concrete edge: 89% better efficiency (210.0 vs 23.1 J/TH). That said, the Antminer AL1 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer AL1 and Bitmain Antminer Z9 sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer Z9 163% more hashrate (16.0 vs 42.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer Z9 71% better power draw (3,360 vs 970 W)
- Bitmain Antminer Z9 89% better efficiency (210.0 vs 23.1 J/TH)
- Antminer AL1 100% better weight (14.5 vs 4,700.0 kg)
- Antminer AL1 246% more heat output (11,464 vs 3,310 BTU/hr)
- Antminer AL1 16% more home mining score (36.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer AL1 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer Z9 |
|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$7.49 | Daily net profit | -$0.82 |
| -$12,733 | Net after 1 year | -$298 |
| -$15,467 | Net after 2 years | -$596 |
| -$18,200 | Net after 3 years | -$895 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer AL1Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer Z923.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer Z9: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer Z9 is more profitable at $-0.82/day compared to $-7.49/day for the Antminer AL1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer AL1 or the Bitmain Antminer Z9 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer AL1 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer Z9 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer AL1 vs Bitmain Antminer Z9: which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer AL1 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer Z9). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Antminer AL1 and Bitmain Antminer Z9?
The Antminer AL1 runs at 210.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer Z9 runs at 23.1 J/TH — a difference of 186.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 89% better efficiency (210.0 vs 23.1 J/TH).