Antminer E9 Pro vs iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer E9 Pro | Specification | iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 |
|---|---|---|
| 3,680.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 260.0 MH/s |
| 2,200 W | Power Consumption | 220 W |
| 597,826.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 846,153.9 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | 40 dB |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 2.1 kg |
| 7,506 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 751 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 66/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer E9 Pro
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260
Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Antminer E9 Pro wins on 3 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 1315% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Antminer E9 Pro's favour. That said, the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Antminer E9 Pro and iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Antminer E9 Pro 1315% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 90% better power draw (2,200 vs 220 W)
- Antminer E9 Pro 29% better efficiency (597,826 vs 846,154 J/TH)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 47% better noise (75.0 vs 40.0 dB)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 85% better weight (14.2 vs 2.1 kg)
- Antminer E9 Pro 900% more heat output (7,506 vs 751 BTU/hr)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 65% more home mining score (40.0 vs 66.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer E9 Pro | Metric | iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 |
|---|---|---|
| $3,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $650 |
| -$5.28 | Daily net profit | -$0.53 |
| -$4,927 | Net after 1 year | -$843 |
| -$6,854 | Net after 2 years | -$1,035 |
| -$8,781 | Net after 3 years | -$1,228 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260Score: 66/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer E9 Pro597,826.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer E9 Pro or iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 is more profitable at $-0.53/day compared to $-5.28/day for the Antminer E9 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer E9 Pro or the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Antminer E9 Pro at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer E9 Pro vs iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260: which fits a residential setup better?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 40/100 for the Antminer E9 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer E9 Pro and iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 on J/TH?
The Antminer E9 Pro runs at 597,826.1 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 runs at 846,153.9 J/TH — a difference of 248,327.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 29% better efficiency (597,826 vs 846,154 J/TH).